angleofscience: (too little input - find more dataz)
Jetfire ([personal profile] angleofscience) wrote2011-10-12 01:38 am
Entry tags:

001 - [Video]

[Jetfire apparently figured out the video-function of the journal very quickly, because that's what pops up; a view of someone white, obviously very large, and metal. As soon as he starts to speak, however, it's clear, for those of you who speak English, that he's not speaking that (or any other langauge mostly anyone here would recognize), so have a text translation.]

... This shouldn't even... ahh, right...

I'm finding the premise I'm supposed to accept rather improbable. The odds of even... ah, something divine having the time to construct a place of safety and then pluck someone... or even several, aren't even astronomical. I'd be generous if I said they were astronomical.

[Jetfire only has a faint frown on his faceplates, but his optics are narrowed and his voice heavy with disbelief. Amusingly enough, despite the science-oriented talk, the heavy blanket of disbelief lightens some on the word 'divine', even if there's a slight sigh accompanying it instead.]

Especially since even the assumption of a 'frozen-moment' would require unfreezing at any change of location, and thus even a pre-knowledge of the so-supposed "end" wouldn't be sufficient. Further, even with such a time window, that alloted time would soon run out.

[Does Jetfire enjoy science so much he wouldn't mind potentially talking to himself about it? Yes. He might also be slightly upset. Maybe.]

And since different universes would, by virtue of natural variation, obey slightly different rules, have slightly different outcomes... A single destructive event encompassing a possible multiverse... or even omniverse and completely wiping it all out is highly unlikely simply by virtue of these internal variations-- [The large, white robot seems to have run out of steam (so to speak) finally, as he drags a hand down his face.]

No matter what is actually going on... How and why am I over two-thirds shorter than I ought to be? [That should just not be possible.]

Also... [There's a deep, slow vent.]

If anyone else is here and has seen... or, ah, heard Starscream... Please inform me.

[There were many others he'd like to ask for, but, presently, this seemed to be the most... important. At least personally and for the general safety of any possible others.]
notpredictable: (Default)

[Video] BUT BUT BUT

[personal profile] notpredictable 2011-10-13 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
[Megamind automatically assumes black material = dark matter, and continues on with this.]
 
Precisely. My theories included the probability of expansion versus contraction and involved certain calculation involving dark matter – which I’m sure you know by definition does not interact with electromagnetic radiation; it’s not only dark [insert finger quotes here!] but also by definition, utterly transparentbut…there is limited tech here to work with, limited resources, and I am unable to come up with any concrete date to form facts as opposed to bouncing bloody theorems off walls.
 
That, and there is no sun here.
 
[Which…is a hindrance, when you think about it. And if there’s no sun that’s a pretty clear indication the sky is FAKE and there in some kind of BUBBLE and that means the night sky is not real, either.
 
Or at least, one can probably safely assume.
]

It can’t possibly have never existed. We’re living proof that it did, at one time, exist. That little addendum to his note is complete and utter cockamamie.
 
[COME ON YOU CAN TRUST THIS FAAAAAAAAAACE]
notpredictable: (I told you to have everything ready // F)

[Video] LET'S HOPE

[personal profile] notpredictable 2011-10-16 11:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, everything still cycles through as if there was a sun, however.

There isn't one.

It's really rather perplexing, to be frank.

[More than perplexing. It's downright eerie.]

I read a bit of Plato and Aristotle when I was a boy, but it wasn't exactly my forte. I prefer hard science as opposed to discussions centered around existential crises.
notpredictable: (Shock and awe! // Wait what?)

[Video]

[personal profile] notpredictable 2011-10-18 03:07 am (UTC)(link)
That's precisely what I was assuming, though I don't happen to have my hover bike here otherwise, I'd check.

[He eyes his journal.]

You don't happen to have flight capabilities, do you? [Hopeful, here.]

Yes, human. [He waves a hand.] Almost pseudo-science if you ask me, but there is some benefit into study in all aspects of the scientific world, I suppose.
notpredictable: (Default)

[Video]

[personal profile] notpredictable 2011-10-18 12:36 pm (UTC)(link)
[Oh Zeus he can barely contain himself from squealing out loud.
 
A flight capable, speaking,
sentient robotic organism, right here in his little Keep! Oh, how marvelous!
 
Yes, His Keep.
]
 
You will keep me informed wont you? With any findings positive or negative? [OR TAKE HIM WITHT YOU SOMEHOW PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE]

No no – not entirely pseudoscience, only almost - but since it doesn’t really define itself as a science it doesn’t quite meet the criteria – but I agree with you regardless.
notpredictable: (ARE YOU SERIOUS // Warming up?!)

[Video]

[personal profile] notpredictable 2011-10-21 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
Well. I'd say it's considerably more than a normal humans, but I'd rather not test the theory out. [SOB. Oh how he wants to go, he misses his hoverbike like BURNING.]

But please. Do tell me your findings.